ISSUE: The Bootloader

Potabi Systems Development | ISSUE #4 - The Bootloader

Originally published on github.com
Authored by Kai Lyons, SEPT 10, 2021

image 

 
The image above represents an error I ran into while building Potabi on Sept-9, 2021. The build is currently supposed to be using the RE Base release b_1.0a-base, the files of which are listed below.


image
For testing purposes, I grabbed the RE Base b_1.0a-base disc1.iso file, as listed in the release. I ran it in QEMU on my personal machine, where the difference in bases between here and on the FreeBSD virtual machine being used for builds should be non-existent. Since I am coming back into development a month after I last did anything, I cannot say with any certainty that this will provide anything useful, but on The Potabi Foundation YouTube Channel, I uploaded a timelapse of this build for fun, not even trying to use it to help debug anything. It shows no issue, as far as I can tell.

Is this possibly an error with the base and kernel tarfiles themselves? Most probably, no. First, they were known to be working at some point in time at least. Second, the disc1.iso is uploaded to these base releases for these kinds of specific issues. If base or kernel are ever updated, so are all of the rest of the files at the same time, especially disc1.iso.

Running disc1.iso in a virtual machine proves with near certainty that my builds with the base and kernel tarballs should absolutely not produce an error.


image

Where may the issues be? Considering everything, I have located a couple possible locations for issues.

  • The ISO creation step (most likely)
  • The addition of software or rc.conf (least likely)

Figuring out what went wrong, where, and why, will be important.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Where BSD Fails, and Potabi Aims to Succeed: Websites

Image
Welcome to a new series of articles I will aim to support called "Were <thing> Fails, and Potabi Aims to Succeed", where I mention specific issues plaguing Linux, BSD, etc. With Potabi and CoreNGS being replacements to BSD and Linux, read Potabi's Biggest Misconception: It isn't BSD. if you haven't because it explains that we are not a BSD, just BSD-derived. When we say websites, I mean ALL websites. I will only be doing active-development BSD-branded operating system websites for most of the big name BSDs, meaning not HelloSystem, AiryxOS, TrueNAS, TrueOS, FuryBSD, etc. Specifically we will critique DragonFlyBSD, NomadBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, FreeBSD, HardenedBSD, and GhostBSD. SoloBSD uses a blogspot for the main website, so I will ignore it. I want to explain why web-design is so important, and how it is often done wrong by the BSDs, and even many Linux distros. And what Potabi does to try and fix it. I am not trying to harass these operating systems, even...
Read more

Potabi's Biggest Misconception: It isn't BSD.

As the lead developer of Potabi, I take full responsibility for fucking this one up. However, we are actually not a BSD system, it's supposed to be (long-term) a new UNIX branch all together, away from any BSD's. Potabi will later include bits and pieces from all sorts of operating systems, including (but not limited to) ReactOS, Illumos, Linux (clones of what they do at least, because of Linux's borderline-abusive license), HaikuOS, Minix, SerenityOS, and others. So Potabi plans to basically rework everything in FreeBSD long-term? Why? Instead of taking the SerenityOS route and doing it 100% from scratch, we are going to utilize open-source software that already exists to give us a short term boost.  But wait, isn't Potabi a "better FreeBSD for desktop and mobile"? Wasn't it a mobile OS? Yes, yes, but also, it's complicated. Potabi was originally just a way for me to get a better mobile OS , then it became bigger and bigger. It has long since not be...
Read more

Linus Tech Tips PROVES WHY POTABI HAS A MARKET

Image
I remember someone telling me "You are foolish to attempt to redefine and redesign all of Unix and Linux." A few said "Linux is easy enough already, why change the fundamental core of what makes Linux, Linux?" And I still get comments "You don't give Linux enough credit in the ease of use and simplicity of the systems we all make." Potabi Systems has always aimed to be a show stopper. A system to give true freedom, and push stability. Change the core of every little detail, and tweak it to make a properly easy operating system. I am no stranger to r/LinuxSucks on Reddit. The current ideology of Potabi was born to move past the lies of Linux, and be honest where we have pitfalls, and make an operating system that  truly works to be a newbie friendly operating system - even if it might take many releases to get there. I shall not step down from my marijuana  appaloosa (high horse, get it?).  Okay, so what the honest to the gods' hell am I talking abo...
Read more