ISSUE: The Bootloader

Potabi Systems Development | ISSUE #4 - The Bootloader

Originally published on github.com
Authored by Kai Lyons, SEPT 10, 2021

image 

 
The image above represents an error I ran into while building Potabi on Sept-9, 2021. The build is currently supposed to be using the RE Base release b_1.0a-base, the files of which are listed below.


image
For testing purposes, I grabbed the RE Base b_1.0a-base disc1.iso file, as listed in the release. I ran it in QEMU on my personal machine, where the difference in bases between here and on the FreeBSD virtual machine being used for builds should be non-existent. Since I am coming back into development a month after I last did anything, I cannot say with any certainty that this will provide anything useful, but on The Potabi Foundation YouTube Channel, I uploaded a timelapse of this build for fun, not even trying to use it to help debug anything. It shows no issue, as far as I can tell.

Is this possibly an error with the base and kernel tarfiles themselves? Most probably, no. First, they were known to be working at some point in time at least. Second, the disc1.iso is uploaded to these base releases for these kinds of specific issues. If base or kernel are ever updated, so are all of the rest of the files at the same time, especially disc1.iso.

Running disc1.iso in a virtual machine proves with near certainty that my builds with the base and kernel tarballs should absolutely not produce an error.


image

Where may the issues be? Considering everything, I have located a couple possible locations for issues.

  • The ISO creation step (most likely)
  • The addition of software or rc.conf (least likely)

Figuring out what went wrong, where, and why, will be important.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Potabi Foundation Endorsements for the Academy School District 20 School Board Election

Image
While we generally do not care for endorsing politics - it is something we have no real say in - we do have endorsements for educational beliefs and support. We strongly believe that our endorsements for candidates in our local area's school board election is important. Students need every right and ability to learn, grow, and work. That is why we are proud to publicly endorse Brian Coram and Michael Riffle for seats in the ASD20 school board elections.  Michael Riffle (Left) and Brian Coram (Right)             These two candidates stand for education above politics. I (Kai Lyons, president and founder of the Potabi Foundation) am an active student at Liberty High School in ASD20, and strongly believe that Riffle and Coram are the two obvious candidates for this election.
Read more

We have an estimate for FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE (and an answer to why we care)

Our estimate is going to use the average all double-digit x.0 and x.1 releases prior to 13.x (10, 11, 12). And we are going to try and estimate the exact day we can assume FreeBSD 13.1 will release. We will take you along our journey, and give exacts and why we have done this. Hint, it will have a lot to do with the release of Potabi 1.0's proper release. To calculate I needed every release to have 3 variables. All values are the days between the "Initial release schedule announcement" and "RELEASE announcement" (as not every releases has a secteam turnover . The first being STF (start to finish). The STF variable is the only one to separate x.0 and x.1 release timelines (by design). Then there is ZOT (Zero-begin to One-end Total), which calculates how many days did it take for the announcement of x.0 to the release announcement of x.1. Lastly there is the ESG (End to Start Gap), which is the calculated time between x.0's release announcement, and x.1's
Read more

Potabi's Biggest Misconception: It isn't BSD.

As the lead developer of Potabi, I take full responsibility for fucking this one up. However, we are actually not a BSD system, it's supposed to be (long-term) a new UNIX branch all together, away from any BSD's. Potabi will later include bits and pieces from all sorts of operating systems, including (but not limited to) ReactOS, Illumos, Linux (clones of what they do at least, because of Linux's borderline-abusive license), HaikuOS, Minix, SerenityOS, and others. So Potabi plans to basically rework everything in FreeBSD long-term? Why? Instead of taking the SerenityOS route and doing it 100% from scratch, we are going to utilize open-source software that already exists to give us a short term boost.  But wait, isn't Potabi a "better FreeBSD for desktop and mobile"? Wasn't it a mobile OS? Yes, yes, but also, it's complicated. Potabi was originally just a way for me to get a better mobile OS , then it became bigger and bigger. It has long since not be
Read more